Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6] 2/2: Fix NAT helper locking

From: Patrick McHardy <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 17:53:21 +0200

David S. Miller wrote:

>Applied both patches, but the first had serious offsets
>and the second had to be applied by hand due to rejects
>against the current 2.6.x sources.
>
>Ummm... wow what ancient tree did you patch against
>Harald?  The tree you patched against didn't even have the
>skb_header_pointer() changes in it, that's caveman
>era :-)  That's what caused the rejects.
>  
>
My fault, I put the patches into patch-o-matic about two or
three weeks ago and didn't expect they wouldn't apply anymore
so quickly :)

>
>Anyways, I merged it all in cleanly.
>
Thanks.

Patrick