Subject: Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?

From: Patrick McHardy <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 06:00:40 +0100

YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / $B5HF#1QL@ wrote:

>In article <[email-masked]> (at Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:11:32 +1100), Herbert Xu <[email-masked]> says:
>
>
>>Patrick McHardy <[email-masked]> wrote:
>>
>>>Ok, final decision: you are right :) conntrack also defragments locally
>>>generated packets before they hit ip_fragment. In this case the fragments
>>>have skb->dst set.
>>>
>>Well caught.  The same thing is needed for IPv6, right?
>>
>
>(not yet confirmed, but) yes, please.
>
We don't need this for IPv6 yet. Once we get nf_conntrack in we
might need this, but its IPv6 fragment handling is different from
ip_conntrack, I need to check first.

Regards
Patrick