Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] net/netlink/: possible cleanups

From: Philip Craig <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:02:08 +1000

On 04/14/2006 06:26 AM, David S. Miller wrote:
> These interfaces were added so that new users of netlink could
> write their code more easily.
>
> Unused does not equate to "comment out or delete".

Does a GENETLINK Kconfig option make sense (possibly dependant on
EMBEDDED)?  I'm unsure whether these interfaces are going to be used
in core networking code that can't be disabled anyway.