Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10] [IOAT] I/OAT patches repost

From: Rick Jones <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:12:26 -0700

David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Rick Jones <[email-masked]>
> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 18:00:37 -0700
> 
> 
>>Actually, that brings-up a question - presently, and for reasons that 
>>are lost to me in the mists of time - netperf will "access" the buffer 
>>before it calls recv().  I'm wondering if that should be changed to an 
>>access of the buffer after it calls recv()?
> 
> 
> Yes, that's what it should do, as this is whan a real
> application would do.

Netperf2 TOT now accesses the buffer that was just recv()'d rather than 
the one that is about to be recv()'d.

rick jones