Subject: Re: [patch] d80211: use pfifo_qdisc_ops rather than d80211-specific qdisc

From: Jochen Friedrich <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:41:30 +0100

Hi Johannes,

> On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 14:18 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
>> This is not about the name that makes sense.  I think using ethX names
>> for wireless devices is utterly stupid, but it's what all current upstream
>> drivers do, and at least for WE compat we'll have to stick to it.
> 
> No, that's not true, zd1201 doesn't [1] :)

Neither does hostap [2] :)

Thanks,
Jochen

[2] http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;h=ed00ebb6e7f4bd255d1a1fe8bf05a6f7a5574d6e;hb=aefba081d7b7dfd1c5752f6e6e709d8b5ab80ab7;f=drivers/net/wireless/hostap/hostap_hw.c#l84