Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtnl: Simplify ASSERT_RTNL

From: Patrick McHardy <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 19:51:18 +0200

Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Regardless of the correctness of where we have ASSERT_RTNL.
> I think not actually taking the mutex on the assertion failure path
> (just so we can release it), is still a good deal regardless.

Agreed. I actually have an identical patch somewhere that
I wanted to submit soon.