Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] Preparatory refactoring part 2.

From: Patrick McHardy <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:33:09 +0200

Corey Hickey wrote:
> The sfq_destroy() --> sfq_q_destroy() change looks pointless here,
> but it's cleaner to split now and add code to sfq_q_destroy() in a
> later patch.
> 
> +static void sfq_destroy(struct Qdisc *sch)
> +{
> +	struct sfq_sched_data *q = qdisc_priv(sch);
> +	sfq_q_destroy(q);
> +}

It does look pointless, after applying all patches sfq_destroy still
remains a simply wrapper around sfq_q_destroy.