Subject: Re: [PATCH] wan: new driver retina

From: Jeff Garzik <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 05:18:36 -0400

Not sure what's going on, but your patch looks scrambled, as scripts 
look at it:

> From: Matti Linnanvuori <[email-masked]>=0A=0AAdding Retina G.7=
> 03 and G.SHDSL driver.=0A=0ASigned-off-by: Matti Linnanvuori <mattilinnanvu=
> [email-masked]>=0A---=0A=0AFixing bugs and style according to netdev mailing=
>  list comments.=0A=0Adiff -Napur linux-2.6.23/drivers/net/wan/Kconfig linux=
> -2.6.24/drivers/net/wan/Kconfig=0A--- linux-2.6.23/drivers/net/wan/Kconfig=
> =092007-10-09 23:31:38.000000000 +0300=0A+++ linux-2.6.24/drivers/net/wan/K=
> config=092007-10-25 09:23:19.933170522 +0300=0A@@ -494,4 +494,15 @@ config =
> SBNI_MULTILINE=0A =0A =09  If unsure, say N.=0A =0A+config RETINA=0A+=09tri=
> state "Retina support"=0A+=09depends on PCI=0A+=09help=0A+=09  Driver for R=

Its been mangled into "Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable" by 
your mailer.

Also, when you revise a patch, please note somehow that this is an 
updated version.  One convention is changing the subject line:

	[PATCH v3] wan: new driver retina

Otherwise I have an mbox full of seemingly-similar patches, all with the 
subject "wan: new driver retina"

	Jeff