Subject: Re: Endianness problem with u32 classifier hash masks

From: Jarek Poplawski <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 02:17:54 +0100

Jarek Poplawski wrote, On 11/04/2007 01:30 AM:

> Jarek Poplawski wrote, On 11/04/2007 12:58 AM:
... 
> Other changes seem to be not needed.
> 
>> But it needs more checking...

But not much more: it's a piece of fshit!

So, even if not full ntohl(), some byte moving seems to be
necessary here.

Sorry for this mess, 
Jarek P