Subject: Re: [PATCH] sky2: Use deferrable timer for watchdog

From: Arjan van de Ven <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 20:42:19 +0100

Kok, Auke wrote:

> ok, that's just bad and if there's no user-defineable limit to the deferral I
> definately don't like this change.
> 
> Can I safely assume that any irq will cause all deferred timers to run?

*on that cpu*. Timers are per cpu, as are interrupts. Just not per se the same one ...