Subject: Re: nf_conntrack fix smp_processor_id() in preemptible code

From: Patrick McHardy <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:47:11 +0100

Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> Am 21.02.2008 12:28 schrieb Patrick McHardy:
>>> Feb 20 17:22:40 xenon kernel: [   48.180297] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: ntpdate/3562
>>> Feb 20 17:22:40 xenon kernel: [   48.180297] caller is __nf_conntrack_find+0x9b/0xeb [nf_conntrack]
>>> Feb 20 17:22:40 xenon kernel: [   48.180297] Pid: 3562, comm: ntpdate Not tainted 2.6.25-rc2-mm1-testing #1
>>> Feb 20 17:22:40 xenon kernel: [   48.180297]  [<c02015b9>] debug_smp_processor_id+0x99/0xb0
>> Could you test whether this patch fixes the netfilter
>> warnings please?
> 
> Bad news: With 2.6.25-rc3, that bug has made it into mainline.
> Good news: Your patch fixes it there, too.

No, its been there since -rc1.

> So I suggest you forward it there as soon as possible.

Already done, should hit upstream soon.