public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Chapman <jchapman@katalix•com>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail•com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>, netdev@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][PPPOL2TP]: Fix SMP oops in pppol2tp driver
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:29:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47CB0E46.9000806@katalix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080226200033.GA6550@ami.dom.local>

Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> James Chapman wrote, On 02/26/2008 01:14 PM:
> ...
>> Luckily, I'm in the lab where my two borrowed servers are today so I 
>> have access to their consoles. Hopefully I'll be able to find out why 
>> there are hanging. Btw, they don't hang if I disable irqs around the 
>> ppp_input() call.
> 
> Maybe you've found the same, or there is some other reason yet, but
> IMHO this locking break around ppp_input() is wrong. Probably there
> is needed more advanced solution, but this should fix the problem if
> it really exists (isn't there possible a race e.g. between receive
> from socket and from network card?).

I tried your patch but the result is the same.

> 
> Jarek P.
> ---
> 
>  drivers/net/pppol2tp.c |   16 ++++++++--------
>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/pppol2tp.c b/drivers/net/pppol2tp.c
> index e0b072d..7c6fcb9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/pppol2tp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/pppol2tp.c
> @@ -363,18 +363,17 @@ out:
>  	spin_unlock(&session->reorder_q.lock);
>  }
>  
> -/* Dequeue a single skb.
> +/* Requeue a single skb.
>   */
> -static void pppol2tp_recv_dequeue_skb(struct pppol2tp_session *session, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +static void pppol2tp_recv_requeue_skb(struct pppol2tp_session *session, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  {
>  	struct pppol2tp_tunnel *tunnel = session->tunnel;
>  	int length = PPPOL2TP_SKB_CB(skb)->length;
>  	struct sock *session_sock = NULL;
>  
> -	/* We're about to requeue the skb, so unlink it and return resources
> +	/* We're about to requeue the skb, so return resources
>  	 * to its current owner (a socket receive buffer).
>  	 */
> -	skb_unlink(skb, &session->reorder_q);
>  	skb_orphan(skb);
>  
>  	tunnel->stats.rx_packets++;
> @@ -436,14 +435,14 @@ static void pppol2tp_recv_dequeue_skb(struct pppol2tp_session *session, struct s
>  static void pppol2tp_recv_dequeue(struct pppol2tp_session *session)
>  {
>  	struct sk_buff *skb;
> -	struct sk_buff *tmp;
>  
>  	/* If the pkt at the head of the queue has the nr that we
>  	 * expect to send up next, dequeue it and any other
>  	 * in-sequence packets behind it.
>  	 */
> +again:
>  	spin_lock(&session->reorder_q.lock);
> -	skb_queue_walk_safe(&session->reorder_q, skb, tmp) {
> +	skb_queue_walk(&session->reorder_q, skb) {

I think this needs the _safe() call because the list may be modified in 
the loop body.

>  		if (time_after(jiffies, PPPOL2TP_SKB_CB(skb)->expires)) {
>  			session->stats.rx_seq_discards++;
>  			session->stats.rx_errors++;
> @@ -469,9 +468,10 @@ static void pppol2tp_recv_dequeue(struct pppol2tp_session *session)
>  				goto out;
>  			}
>  		}
> +		__skb_unlink(skb, &session->reorder_q);
>  		spin_unlock(&session->reorder_q.lock);
> -		pppol2tp_recv_dequeue_skb(session, skb);
> -		spin_lock(&session->reorder_q.lock);
> +		pppol2tp_recv_requeue_skb(session, skb);
> +		goto again;

I'd prefer to take the spinlock again after the recv_dequeue_skb() call 
to avoid the goto.


-- 
James Chapman
Katalix Systems Ltd
http://www.katalix.com
Catalysts for your Embedded Linux software development


  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-02 20:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-11  9:22 [PATCH][PPPOL2TP]: Fix SMP oops in pppol2tp driver James Chapman
2008-02-11 18:57 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-02-11 22:19   ` James Chapman
2008-02-11 22:49     ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-02-11 22:55       ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-02-11 23:42         ` James Chapman
2008-02-12 10:42           ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-02-11 23:41       ` James Chapman
2008-02-12  5:30         ` David Miller
2008-02-12 10:58           ` James Chapman
2008-02-12 13:24             ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-02-13  6:00             ` David Miller
2008-02-13  7:29               ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-02-14 13:00             ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-02-18 22:09               ` James Chapman
2008-02-18 23:01                 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-02-19  9:09                   ` James Chapman
2008-02-19  4:29                 ` David Miller
2008-02-19  9:03                   ` James Chapman
2008-02-19 10:30                     ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-02-19 10:36                       ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-02-19 14:37                       ` James Chapman
2008-02-19 23:06                 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-02-19 23:28                   ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-02-20 16:02                   ` James Chapman
2008-02-20 18:38                     ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-02-20 22:37                       ` James Chapman
2008-02-21  8:59                         ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-02-21  9:53                           ` James Chapman
2008-02-21 12:08                             ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-02-21 17:09                               ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-02-25 12:19                                 ` James Chapman
2008-02-25 13:05                                   ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-02-25 13:39                                     ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-02-25 14:02                                       ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-02-25 21:58                                       ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-02-26 12:14                                         ` James Chapman
2008-02-26 13:03                                           ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-02-26 13:18                                             ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-02-26 20:00                                           ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-02 20:29                                             ` James Chapman [this message]
2008-03-03  8:22                                               ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-03  9:35                                                 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-02-27 10:54                                           ` [PATCH][PPPOL2TP] add missing sock_put() in pppol2tp_recv_dequeue() Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-02 20:31                                             ` James Chapman
2008-03-04  4:49                                               ` David Miller
2008-02-27 11:48                                           ` [PATCH][PPPOL2TP] add missing sock_put() in pppol2tp_tunnel_closeall() Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-02 20:32                                             ` James Chapman
2008-03-04  4:49                                               ` David Miller
2008-02-22 14:16                             ` [PATCH][NET] sock.c: sk_dst_lock lockdep keys and names per af_family Jarek Poplawski
2008-02-12  7:19         ` [PATCH][PPPOL2TP]: Fix SMP oops in pppol2tp driver Jarek Poplawski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47CB0E46.9000806@katalix.com \
    --to=jchapman@katalix$(echo .)com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=jarkao2@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox