Subject: Re: Question about HFSC atm+man patches

From: Michal Soltys <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:21:01 +0100

Patrick McHardy wrote:
> 
> qdisc_pkt_len already returns an adjusted length based on "size tables".
> Check out qdisc_enqueue()/qdisc_enqueue_root() for details.
> 
> Is there something missing for overhead calculation?

Thanks for pointing that out. It will fit well.

I'll have to wrap my head around the sources first though (even if the 
concept became even simpler now) - the patches for hfsc submitted in 
July along the ones for size tables, were a bit more extensive compared 
to what I've planned.