Subject: Re: Question about HFSC atm+man patches

From: Michal Soltys <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 23:54:17 +0100

One question regarding size tables:

Should I assume that subsequent qdiscs attached to HFSC leaves will not 
use [different] size tables ?

This is currently the case, but from the perspective of a generic 
solution - if some inner qdisc changes pkt_len stored in cb area during 
qdisc_enqueue, then HFSC might get wrong size during peek operation.

As leaves will usually have "simple" work-conserving qdiscs attached, 
this is probably not an issue, but ...