public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay•com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor•org>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash•net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft•net>,
	Netfilter Developers <netfilter-devel@vger•kernel.org>,
	Linux Network Development list <netdev@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two critical loops in ip_packet_match()
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:27:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49833889.4000201@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090130172705.GB18453@one.firstfloor.org>

Andi Kleen a écrit :
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 05:54:10PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> Andi Kleen a écrit :
>>> Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay•com> writes:
>>>
>>>> While doing oprofile tests I noticed two loops are not properly unrolled by gcc
>>> That's because nobody passed -funroll-loops. Did you try that for
>>> that file? Likely will need -O2 too
>> I dont want to unroll all loops, only those two :)
> 
> gcc 4.4 will have a way to do that per function, but earlier
> you would need to move it to a separate file and specify
> the option only for that.
> 
> Doing so would be still a good idea compared to your
> patch because the code will be cleaner and might
> be more adaptable to future architectures
> (such manual tunings tend to outdate)

So... you suggest me to split file, and use a "-funroll-loops",
that might doing strange things on some arches / compilers...

This is far too complicated and risky imho.

Check compare_ether_addr_64bits() definition in 
include/linux/etherdevice.h for a truly unreadable code :)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger•kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-30 17:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-26 22:15 32 core net-next stack/netfilter "scaling" Rick Jones
2009-01-26 23:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-26 23:14   ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-01-26 23:19   ` Rick Jones
2009-01-27  9:10     ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-27  9:15       ` Patrick McHardy
2009-01-27 11:29         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-27 11:37           ` Patrick McHardy
2009-01-27 16:23         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-27 17:33           ` Patrick McHardy
2009-01-27 18:02             ` Rick Jones
2009-01-27 19:09               ` Rick Jones
2009-01-27 19:24                 ` Rick Jones
2009-01-27 22:17                   ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-27 22:29                     ` Rick Jones
2009-01-27 22:34                       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-27 22:43                         ` Rick Jones
2009-01-28 13:55                   ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-28 16:25                     ` Patrick McHardy
2009-01-28 17:07                       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-28 17:34                         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-29 15:31                           ` [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two critical loops in ip_packet_match() Eric Dumazet
2009-01-30 15:47                             ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-30 16:54                               ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-30 17:27                                 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-30 17:27                                   ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-01-30 17:50                                     ` Andi Kleen
2009-02-09 13:41                                   ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-18 15:10                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2009-02-18 15:21                                       ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-18 16:33                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-02-18 16:52                                           ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-18 17:36                                           ` [PATCH] netfilter: xt_physdev fixes Eric Dumazet
2009-02-18 18:14                                             ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-19  8:00                                               ` [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two loops in physdev_mt() Eric Dumazet
2009-02-19  8:14                                                 ` [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two loops in ip6_packet_match() Eric Dumazet
2009-02-19 10:19                                                   ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-19 10:17                                                 ` [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two loops in physdev_mt() Patrick McHardy
2009-02-20 10:02                             ` [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two critical loops in ip_packet_match() Eric Dumazet
2009-02-20 10:04                               ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-09 14:57                           ` 32 core net-next stack/netfilter "scaling" Patrick McHardy
2009-02-10 18:44   ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49833889.4000201@cosmosbay.com \
    --to=dada1@cosmosbay$(echo .)com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor$(echo .)org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=kaber@trash$(echo .)net \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox