Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] cxgb3: move away from LLTX

From: Divy Le Ray <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:28:04 -0700

David Miller wrote:
> From: Divy Le Ray <[email-masked]>
> Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 00:58:24 -0700
>
>   
>> From: Divy Le Ray <[email-masked]>
>>
>> cxgb3 no longer advertizes LLTX.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Divy Le Ray <[email-masked]>
>>     
>
> You might want to mention that these two patches depend
> upon the 2.6.30 cxgb3 patches you also submitted at this
> time and aren't in the tree yet. :-/
>   

Sorry about that. It actually conflicts with Eric Dumazet's trans_start 
removal patch.
I'll resubmit the net-next patches, refreshed on op of Eric's patch.
I also verified that the 2.6.30 cxgb3 patches apply
before or after the cxgb3 net-next series is applied.

Cheers,
Divy