Subject: Re: [resend] Passive OS fingerprint xtables match.

From: Patrick McHardy <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:16:17 +0200

Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 02:11:24PM +0200, Patrick McHardy ([email-masked]) wrote:
>> Thats not what I meant. struct xt_match_param is passed to the
>> ->match() callbacks from *t_do_table(). This is where you can
>> add the real hook number to have it available in ->match().
>>
>> (Forgot to mention earlier: please in a seperate patch and adjusting
>>  all *tables copies)
> 
> Kind of this (for ipv4 only so far, also reorderd a field to fill the
> gap):

Exactly. But please verify that by reordering, you're not moving
the more commonly used members out of the first cacheline.