Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] Document future removal of sysctl_tcp_* options

From: Gilad Ben-Yossef <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:23:21 +0200

William Allen Simpson wrote:

> Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
>> +What:    sysctl_tcp_sack, sysctl_tcp_timestamps, 
>> sysctl_tcp_window_scaling,
>> +    sysctl_tcp_dsack
>
> Opposed to removing, as this is a common configuration for *BSD.  It 
> helps
> operators to have similar utility across systems.
>
> net.inet.tcp.sack.enable
>
> net.inet.tcp.timestamps
>
> net.inet.tcp.win_scale
>
> Support removing sysctl_tcp_dsack, as this appears to be Linux-only.

I have no issue with leaving those, if everyone thinks we're better off.

BTW, while we're talking about OS envy, I do believe that Windows do let
you specify on a per route basis. Not that this is really a good ground for
technical decision, but still... :-)

Gilad

-- 
Gilad Ben-Yossef
Chief Coffee Drinker & CTO
Codefidence Ltd.

Web:   http://codefidence.com
Cell:  +972-52-8260388
Skype: gilad_codefidence
Tel:   +972-8-9316883 ext. 201
Fax:   +972-8-9316884
Email: [email-masked]

Check out our Open Source technology and training blog - http://tuxology.net

	"Sorry cannot parse this, its too long to be true  :)"
	  -- Eric Dumazet on netdev mailing list