Subject: Re: mmotm-2009-12-08-17-45 resume slowly

From: Nigel Cunningham <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:11:37 +1100

Dave, could you be more specific?

Is the delay Ksaki has picked out related to your report...

KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> (cc to netdev)
> 
> Hi net-folks
> 
>>> [  561.323866] mtrr: type mismatch for e0000000,10000000 old:
>>> write-back new: write-combining
>>> [ 2688.500033] No probe response from AP 00:02:2d:08:51:2b after
>>> 500ms, disconnecting.
>>> [ 2689.580376] wlan0: direct probe to AP 00:02:2d:08:51:2b (try 1)
> 
> What's mean "No probe response"? Why its point waste 2000sec?

[...]

>>> [  225.731462] ACPI: Preparing to enter system sleep state S3
>>> [  225.754167] Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
>>> [  225.809478] CPU 1 is now offline
>>> [  225.809481] lockdep: fixing up alternatives.
>>> [  225.809487] SMP alternatives: switching to UP code
>>> [  225.816500] Extended CMOS year: 2000
>>> [  225.816500] Back to C!
>>> [  225.816500] Extended CMOS year: 2000
>>> [  225.816720] Enabling non-boot CPUs ...
>>> [  225.818422] lockdep: fixing up alternatives.
>>> [  225.818425] SMP alternatives: switching to SMP code
>>> [  225.822188] Booting processor 1 APIC 0x1 ip 0x6000
>>> [  225.818021] Initializing CPU#1
>>> [  225.818021] CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
>>> [  225.818021] CPU: Processor Core ID: 1
>>> [  225.913392] CPU1: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU     T7250  @ 2.00GHz stepping 0d
>>> [  225.937046] microcode: CPU1 sig=0x6fd, pf=0x80, revision=0xa3
>>> [  225.937053] platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/06-0f-0d
>>> [  225.937179] firmware microcode: parent microcode should not be sleeping
>>> [  285.940840] CPU1 is up

... or the 60 second delay before the CPU1 is up message?

Regards,

Nigel