From: "Timo Teräs" <timo.teras@iki•fi>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor•apana.org.au>
Cc: netdev@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] flow: delayed deletion of flow cache entries
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:43:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BB1F20B.1010300@iki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100330123612.GB6174@gondor.apana.org.au>
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 03:32:58PM +0300, Timo Teräs wrote:
>> If flow cache regeneration or shrinking is triggered in lookup,
>> it would previously free it in place. Now that is deferred. But
>> yes, it's more useful after the next patches that call the
>> virtual destructor. Should have explained this better.
>
> Any chance you can refactor them so that this comes after the
> virtual get/put patch?
>
> That way can evaluate this on its own merit rather than being
> a prerequisite for the more important stuff.
I thought it's not good to have possible speed regressions even
temporarily in the tree, so I figured this should go first.
But sure, I'll refactor this to be a later commit for the next
iteration.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-30 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-29 14:12 [PATCH 0/7] caching bundles, iteration 2 Timo Teras
2010-03-29 14:12 ` [PATCH 1/7] xfrm: remove policy lock when accessing policy->walk.dead Timo Teras
2010-03-29 14:43 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-30 4:55 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-30 11:53 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-30 12:04 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-30 12:14 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-30 12:21 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-30 12:23 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-30 12:41 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-30 12:48 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-30 13:33 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-30 14:30 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-30 14:34 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-30 14:37 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-30 14:01 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-30 14:29 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-30 15:36 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-31 0:43 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-29 14:12 ` [PATCH 2/7] flow: structurize flow cache Timo Teras
2010-03-30 12:01 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-30 12:02 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-30 12:15 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-29 14:12 ` [PATCH 3/7] flow: allocate hash table for online cpus only Timo Teras
2010-03-30 12:12 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-31 12:32 ` Rusty Russell
2010-03-31 13:27 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-29 14:12 ` [PATCH 4/7] flow: delayed deletion of flow cache entries Timo Teras
2010-03-30 12:22 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-30 12:32 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-30 12:36 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-30 12:43 ` Timo Teräs [this message]
2010-03-29 14:12 ` [PATCH 5/7] flow: virtualize get and entry deletion methods Timo Teras
2010-03-29 14:12 ` [PATCH 6/7] xfrm: cache bundles instead of policies for outgoing flows Timo Teras
2010-03-29 14:12 ` [PATCH 7/7] xfrm: remove policy garbage collection Timo Teras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BB1F20B.1010300@iki.fi \
--to=timo.teras@iki$(echo .)fi \
--cc=herbert@gondor$(echo .)apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox