Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] IPv6: Generic TTL Security Mechanism (original version)

From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:48:26 +0900

Hi,

(2010/04/04 8:21), Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> The original proposed code; the IPV6 and IPV4 socket options are seperate.
> With this method, the server does have to deal with both IPv4 and IPv6
> socket options and the client has to handle the different for each
> family.

I am for 1/3 (original), not for 2/3, 3/3.

Because we should allow users to set respective value
for IPv4 and IPv6, as we allow users to do so for TTL
and hoplimit itself.

--yoshfuji