From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel•org>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic•com>
Cc: "Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@intel•com>,
Henning Fehrmann <henning.fehrmann@aei•mpg.de>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel•com>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel•com>,
"Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@intel•com>,
"Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel•com>,
"netdev@vger•kernel.org" <netdev@vger•kernel.org>,
Carsten Aulbert <carsten.aulbert@aei•mpg.de>
Subject: Re: loosing IPMI-card by loading netconsole
Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 00:11:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BEDCA89.7000707@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1273858653.15067.1335.camel@calx>
Hello,
On 05/14/2010 07:37 PM, Matt Mackall wrote:
>> On 2.6.27.39, netconsole + IPMI works fine. On 2.6.32.7, as soon as
>> netconsole is loaded, IPMI stops working. Unloading netconsole
>> doesn't revive IPMI but detaching the driver from the controller does.
>> In both cases, usual networking works fine.
>
> Looks like a job for bisect.
Yeap, sure, it would be effective but I kind of want to leave
bisection as the last resort. Bisection is a somewhat painful process
especially when the machine isn't right next to you and someone who
has overall knowledge can often identify the problem much easier with
appropriate debugging info.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-14 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-14 13:45 loosing IPMI-card by loading netconsole Henning Fehrmann
2010-05-14 14:51 ` Ronciak, John
2010-05-14 16:27 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-14 16:39 ` Ronciak, John
2010-05-14 17:20 ` "Brandeburg, Jesse"
2010-05-14 22:18 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-15 8:26 ` Carsten Aulbert
2010-05-15 9:10 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-15 9:36 ` Carsten Aulbert
2010-05-14 17:37 ` Matt Mackall
2010-05-14 22:11 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-05-14 22:16 ` Matt Mackall
2010-05-14 22:24 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-18 13:12 ` Henning Fehrmann
2010-05-20 10:16 ` Henning Fehrmann
2010-05-20 15:01 ` Allan, Bruce W
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BEDCA89.7000707@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel$(echo .)org \
--cc=bruce.w.allan@intel$(echo .)com \
--cc=carsten.aulbert@aei$(echo .)mpg.de \
--cc=henning.fehrmann@aei$(echo .)mpg.de \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel$(echo .)com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel$(echo .)com \
--cc=john.ronciak@intel$(echo .)com \
--cc=mpm@selenic$(echo .)com \
--cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox