Subject: Re: [Patch] infiniband: check local reserved ports

From: Cong Wang <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 09:53:30 +0800

On 06/04/10 00:39, Roland Dreier wrote:
>   >  Since Tetsuo's patch already got merged, now this is the missing part
>   >  for local port reservation.
>   >
>   >  Cc: Roland Dreier<[email-masked]>
>   >  Cc: Tetsuo Handa<penguin-kernel-1yMVhJb1mP/[email-masked]>
>   >  Signed-off-by: WANG Cong<[email-masked]>
>   >
>   >  ---
>   >  diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
>   >  index b930b81..7b89bab 100644
>   >  --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
>   >  +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
>   >  @@ -1978,6 +1978,7 @@ static int cma_alloc_any_port(struct idr *ps, struct rdma_id_private *id_priv)
>   >   	rover = net_random() % remaining + low;
>   >   retry:
>   >   	if (last_used_port != rover&&
>   >  +	    !inet_is_reserved_local_port(rover)&&
>   >   	!idr_find(ps, (unsigned short) rover)) {
>   >   		int ret = cma_alloc_port(ps, id_priv, rover);
>   >   		/*
>
> Should this inet_is_reserved_local_port() test apply to all the "port
> spaces" that this code is handling?  I honestly am ignorant of the
> intended semantics of the new local_reserved_ports stuff, hence my question.
>

Yes, but I only found this case, is there any else?

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email-masked]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html