public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash•net>
To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail•com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail•com>,
	Netfilter Developers <netfilter-devel@vger•kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC nf-next-2.6] conntrack: per cpu nf_conntrack_untracked
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 14:29:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C08F1A4.2050906@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilKEpFTg5bH8d9UE3a3DVJNAGYz10Jgkt6lXtJ0@mail.gmail.com>

Changli Gao wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash•net> wrote:
>> Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> Obviously, an IPS_UNTRACKED bit would be much easier to implement.
>>> Would it be acceptable ?
>> That also would be fine. However the main idea behind using a nfctinfo
>> bit was that we wouldn't need the untracked conntrack anymore at all.
>> But I guess a per-cpu untrack conntrack would already be an improvement
>> over the current situation.
> 
> I think Eric didn't mean ip_conntrack_info but ip_conntrack_status
> bit. Since we have had a IPS_TEMPLATE bit, I think another
> IPS_UNTRACKED bit is also acceptable.

Yes, of course. But using one of these bits implies that we'd still
have the untracked conntrack.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-04 12:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-22 12:58 DDoS attack causing bad effect on conntrack searches Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2010-04-22 13:13 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-22 13:17   ` Patrick McHardy
2010-04-22 14:36     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-22 14:53       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-22 15:51         ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-22 16:02           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-22 16:34             ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-22 20:38             ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2010-04-22 21:03               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-22 21:14                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-22 23:44                   ` David Miller
2010-04-23  5:44                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-23  8:13                       ` David Miller
2010-04-23  8:18                         ` David Miller
2010-04-23  8:40                           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2010-04-23 10:36                   ` Patrick McHardy
2010-04-23 11:06                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-22 21:28                 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2010-04-23  7:23                   ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-23  7:46                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-23  7:55                       ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-23  9:23                         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-23 10:55                 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-04-23 11:05                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-23 11:06                     ` Patrick McHardy
2010-04-23 20:57               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-24 11:11                 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2010-04-24 20:11                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-26 14:36                     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2010-05-31 21:21                       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-01  0:28                         ` Changli Gao
2010-06-01  5:05                           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-01  5:48                             ` Changli Gao
2010-06-01 10:18                             ` Patrick McHardy
2010-06-01 10:31                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-01 10:41                                 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-06-01 16:20                                   ` [RFC nf-next-2.6] conntrack: per cpu nf_conntrack_untracked Eric Dumazet
2010-06-04 11:40                                     ` Patrick McHardy
2010-06-04 12:10                                       ` Changli Gao
2010-06-04 12:29                                         ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2010-06-04 12:36                                           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-04 16:25                                             ` [PATCH nf-next-2.6] conntrack: IPS_UNTRACKED bit Eric Dumazet
2010-06-04 20:15                                               ` [PATCH nf-next-2.6 2/2] conntrack: per_cpu untracking Eric Dumazet
2010-06-08 14:29                                                 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-06-08 14:52                                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-08 15:12                                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-09 12:45                                                       ` Patrick McHardy
2010-06-08 14:12                                               ` [PATCH nf-next-2.6] conntrack: IPS_UNTRACKED bit Patrick McHardy
2010-04-23 10:56       ` DDoS attack causing bad effect on conntrack searches Patrick McHardy
2010-04-23 12:45         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2010-04-23 13:57           ` Patrick McHardy
2010-04-22 13:31   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2010-04-23 10:35     ` Patrick McHardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C08F1A4.2050906@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash$(echo .)net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaosuo@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox