Subject: Re: Weak host model vs .interface down

From: Rick Jones <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:13:42 -0700

> The weak model doesn't go into such detail, it is assumption/impl. detail
> to assume that the ip address still is part of the system even when the interface
> is down. One could just as well define interface down as temporarly removing
> the IP address from the system too. This makes make much more sense to me and
> if you always want the system to answer on a IP adress you make it an IP alias.
> 
> Since the current behaviour is a problem to me and routers in general, can
> we change this? What is the current usage model which needs it to stay as is?

Router != end-system  so I wouldn't think the weak or strong end-system model 
would apply to a router.  I think Stephen already posted a patch to allow that 
for when one's box was a router rather than an end-system.

rick jones
It's a router!
No, it's an end-system!
...
http://snltranscripts.jt.org/75/75ishimmer.phtml