Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED 1/3] vhost: replace vhost_workqueue with per-vhost kthread

From: Tejun Heo <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:34:44 +0200

Hello,

On 07/26/2010 05:25 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> BTW, kthread_worker would benefit from the optimization I implemented
> here as well.

Hmmm... I'm not quite sure whether it's an optimization.  I thought
the patch was due to feeling uncomfortable about using barriers?  Is
it an optimization?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun