public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public•gmane.org>
To: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan-fJ+pQTUTwRTk1uMJSBkQmQ@public•gmane.org>
Cc: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public•gmane.org,
	Socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public•gmane.org,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public•gmane.org>,
	David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public•gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v3 1/1] can: c_can: Added support for Bosch C_CAN controller
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 15:40:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D29C8F6.5030806@grandegger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D299583.10909-fJ+pQTUTwRTk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>

Hi Oliver,

On 01/09/2011 12:01 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> On 06.01.2011 21:08, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> Hi Marc,
>>
>> On 01/06/2011 08:44 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> 
>>> If this driver will be merged, we'll have two drivers for the same can
>>> core in the tree. The other one is the pch_can. What do you think should
>>> be the mid term perspective for ccan based hardware?
>>
>> Yes, I know. Unfortunately, we did realize rather late the the PCH
>> controller is a C_CAN clone and the OKI/Intel ppls did not tell us
>> either. Therefore I asked Bhupesh to provide a SJA1000-a-like interface
>> for the C_CAN, which would allow us to provide an alternative PCI driver
>> "pch_pci.c" for the PCH. If that driver works well on the PCH hardware
>> as well, we should merge the best of both, if necessary, and then
>> finally remove the pch_can driver. Would that be a reasonable proposal.
> 
> At least for me this looks great. The idea to have a similar approach as we
> successfully implemented for the sja1000 will solve future hardware
> implementations based on the ccan controller core.

A common driver for c_can based devices will stabilize more quickly and
does also especially reduce the maintanance effort significantly.

> BTW. for the next submission of Bhupeshs patchset, i would propose to name the
> driver 'ccan' instead of 'c_can', so that we have a
> 
>     linux/drivers/net/can/ccan/...
> 
> path.

You are late ;-). Bosch named the controller *C_CAN* and therefore I
asked Bhupesh some time ago to change the file name and variable name
prefix from ccan to c_can.

> Checking directory names in linux/drivers with
> 
>     find . -type d | grep '_'
> 
> driver names with underscores are pretty unusual and mostly selected without
> fortune:
> 
> ./staging/olpc_dcon
> ./staging/wlags49_h2
> ./staging/wlags49_h2/man
> ./staging/serqt_usb2
> ./staging/intel_sst
> ./staging/quatech_usb2
> ./staging/asus_oled
> ./staging/wlags49_h25
> ./staging/ath6kl/hif/sdio/linux_sdio             <- Ugh!
> ./staging/ath6kl/hif/sdio/linux_sdio/src
> ./staging/ath6kl/hif/sdio/linux_sdio/include
> ./net/pch_gbe
> ./net/fs_enet
> ./net/wireless/libertas_tf
> ./net/ibm_newemacds
> 
> For that reason i would prefer 'ccan' to name this driver core.

Well, not really a strong argument. But well, if other people do
*prefer* ccan I would not object against it. Bhupesh, what's your opinion.

Wolfgang.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-01-09 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-04  9:59 [PATCH net-next-2.6 v3 1/1] can: c_can: Added support for Bosch C_CAN controller Bhupesh Sharma
     [not found] ` <1294135195-9448-1-git-send-email-bhupesh.sharma-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-06 19:33   ` David Miller
     [not found]     ` <20110106.113356.102556872.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-06 19:40       ` Wolfgang Grandegger
     [not found]         ` <4D261AAA.5030005-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-06 19:44           ` Marc Kleine-Budde
     [not found]             ` <4D261BA4.2020003-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-06 20:08               ` Wolfgang Grandegger
     [not found]                 ` <4D262158.4030301-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-09 11:01                   ` Oliver Hartkopp
     [not found]                     ` <4D299583.10909-fJ+pQTUTwRTk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-09 14:40                       ` Wolfgang Grandegger [this message]
     [not found]                         ` <4D29C8F6.5030806-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-11  4:13                           ` Bhupesh SHARMA
     [not found]                             ` <D5ECB3C7A6F99444980976A8C6D896384DEAFA2D56-8vAmw3ZAcdzhJTuQ9jeba9BPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-11  8:31                               ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2011-01-11 21:01                               ` Oliver Hartkopp
2011-01-08  9:09   ` Wolfgang Grandegger
     [not found]     ` <4D2829C5.5020206-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-11  4:50       ` Bhupesh SHARMA
     [not found]         ` <D5ECB3C7A6F99444980976A8C6D896384DEAFA2D9D-8vAmw3ZAcdzhJTuQ9jeba9BPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-11  8:29           ` Wolfgang Grandegger
     [not found]             ` <4D2C14FE.7080903-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-11 18:25               ` Wolfgang Grandegger
     [not found]                 ` <4D2CA0AA.6080505-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-11 22:01                   ` Marc Kleine-Budde
     [not found]                     ` <4D2CD34B.8000609-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-11 22:38                       ` Wolfram Sang
     [not found]                         ` <20110111223843.GB18762-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-11 22:48                           ` Marc Kleine-Budde
     [not found]                             ` <4D2CDE49.3030302-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-11 23:05                               ` Wolfram Sang
2011-01-12  8:47                       ` Wolfgang Grandegger
     [not found]                         ` <4D2D6ABE.7000405-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-12  8:53                           ` Marc Kleine-Budde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D29C8F6.5030806@grandegger.com \
    --to=wg-5yr1bzd7o62+xt7jha+gda@public$(echo .)gmane.org \
    --cc=Socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public$(echo .)gmane.org \
    --cc=davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public$(echo .)gmane.org \
    --cc=mkl-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public$(echo .)gmane.org \
    --cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public$(echo .)gmane.org \
    --cc=socketcan-fJ+pQTUTwRTk1uMJSBkQmQ@public$(echo .)gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox