Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] can: at91_can: clean up usage of AT91_MB_RX_FIRST and AT91_MB_RX_NUM

From: Wolfgang Grandegger <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 08:14:10 +0100

On 01/22/2011 01:54 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Marc Kleine-Budde <[email-masked]>
> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:50:36 +0100
> 
>> On 01/11/2011 02:21 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>>> This patch cleans up the usage of two macros which specify the mailbox
>>> usage. AT91_MB_RX_FIRST and AT91_MB_RX_NUM define the first and the
>>> number of RX mailboxes. The current driver uses these variables in an
>>> unclean way; assuming that AT91_MB_RX_FIRST is 0;
>>>
>>> This patch cleans up the usage of these macros, no longer assuming
>>> AT91_MB_RX_FIRST == 0.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <[email-masked]>
>>
>> Any comments on this?
> 
> I would also seriously like to see these changes get some feedback,
> they've been rotting in patchwork for more than a week.

V2 was OK and it got my "Acked-by" here:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=129534267002747&w=2

Wolfgang.