Subject: Re: [patch net-next-2.6 3/8] net: get rid of multiple bond-related netdevice->priv_flags

From: Nicolas de Pesloüan<[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 15:46:46 +0100

Le 05/03/2011 15:37, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
> On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 15:14 +0100, Nicolas de Pesloüan wrote:
>> Le 05/03/2011 11:29, Jiri Pirko a écrit :
> [...]
>>> --- a/include/linux/if.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/if.h
>>> @@ -60,21 +60,17 @@
>>>    #define IFF_802_1Q_VLAN 0x1             /* 802.1Q VLAN device.          */
>>>    #define IFF_EBRIDGE	0x2		/* Ethernet bridging device.	*/
>>>    #define IFF_SLAVE_INACTIVE	0x4	/* bonding slave not the curr. active */
>>> -#define IFF_MASTER_8023AD	0x8	/* bonding master, 802.3ad. 	*/
>>> -#define IFF_MASTER_ALB	0x10		/* bonding master, balance-alb.	*/
>>> -#define IFF_BONDING	0x20		/* bonding master or slave	*/
>>> -#define IFF_SLAVE_NEEDARP 0x40		/* need ARPs for validation	*/
>>> -#define IFF_ISATAP	0x80		/* ISATAP interface (RFC4214)	*/
>>> -#define IFF_MASTER_ARPMON 0x100		/* bonding master, ARP mon in use */
>>> -#define IFF_WAN_HDLC	0x200		/* WAN HDLC device		*/
>>> -#define IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE 0x400	/* dev_hard_start_xmit() is allowed to
>>> +#define IFF_BONDING	0x8		/* bonding master or slave	*/
>>> +#define IFF_ISATAP	0x10		/* ISATAP interface (RFC4214)	*/
>>> +#define IFF_WAN_HDLC	0x20		/* WAN HDLC device		*/
>>> +#define IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE 0x40	/* dev_hard_start_xmit() is allowed to
>>>    					 * release skb->dst
>>>    					 */
>>
>> Why did you changed those values? Aren't those exposed to userland? Just removing the unused one
>> sounds good to me.
> [...]
>
> Look just one line further up:
>
> /* Private (from user) interface flags (netdevice->priv_flags). */
>
> Maybe they should have a prefix IFPF_ instead of IFF_ though.
>
> Ben.

Yes, I noticed it while reviewing the next one. Sorry for the noise.

So,

Reviewed-by: Nicolas de Pesloüan <[email-masked]>