Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] strict user copy checks on x86_64

From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 16:33:33 -0700

On 05/24/2011 02:29 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> 
> It looks like 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7 got picked up. Should I resend the left
> over patches with appropriate acked-bys and tags? Would it be
> appropriate to push this through your tree?
> 

I was first going to think I'd pick up 8 and 9 in tip, but since 9 is
cross-architecture, Andrew's tree might be better.

Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <[email-masked]>

	-hpa