Subject: Re: what's causing "ip_rt_bug"?

From: Tomasz Chmielewski <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:30:11 +0200

On 28.06.2011 05:55, David Miller wrote:

>> 	The resulting handling should be:
>>
>> - REJECT TCP:
>> 	- in INPUT we can provide addr_type = RTN_LOCAL but
>> 	better allow rejecting traffic delivered with
>> 	local route (no IP address =>  use RTN_UNSPEC to
>> 	allow also RTN_UNICAST).
>> 	- FORWARD: RTN_UNSPEC =>  allow RTN_LOCAL/RTN_UNICAST
>> 	saddr, add fix to ignore RTN_BROADCAST and RTN_MULTICAST
>> 	- OUTPUT: RTN_UNSPEC
>>
>> - NAT, mangle, ip_queue, nf_ip_reroute: RTN_UNSPEC in LOCAL_OUT
>>
>> - IPVS:
>> 	- use RTN_LOCAL in LOCAL_OUT and FORWARD after SNAT
>> 	to restrict saddr to be local
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov<[email-masked]>
>
> Unless someone gives some negative feedback soon I'm going to
> apply this.

Can you tell me where it will be pushed?

I.e. 3.x kernels only, or does it have a chance to go into 2.6.39.x?

-- 
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org