public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladislav Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp•com>
To: netdev@vger•kernel.org, davem@davemloft•net,
	Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn•fujitsu.com>,
	Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us•ibm.com>,
	linux-sctp@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp: ABORT if receive queue is not empty while closing socket
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:11:06 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E0C83FA.2090909@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110630133122.GB24074@canuck.infradead.org>

On 06/30/2011 09:31 AM, Thomas Graf wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:14:41PM -0400, Vladislav Yasevich wrote:
>> Right.  The lack of ABORT from the receive of data is a bug.  I was trying to point out
>> that instead of modified the sender of data to send the ABORT, you modify the receiver
>> to send the ABORT when it is being closed while having data queued.
> 
> Is this what you had in mind?

Almost.  It could really be a simple true/false condition about recvqueue or inqueue
being non-empty.  If that's the case, trigger abort.

-vlad

> 
> Trigger user ABORT when a socket is closed which has skbs sitting on
> the receive queue. If data was lost, there is no point in doing a
> graceful shutdown. This is consistent with TCP behaviour.
> 
> This also resolves the situation when a receiver cannot reopen its rwnd
> and the sender continues retransmission attempts indefinitely before
> initiating the shutdown.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@infradead•org>
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/sctp/ulpevent.h b/include/net/sctp/ulpevent.h
> index 99b027b..ca4693b 100644
> --- a/include/net/sctp/ulpevent.h
> +++ b/include/net/sctp/ulpevent.h
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static inline struct sctp_ulpevent *sctp_skb2event(struct sk_buff *skb)
>  
>  void sctp_ulpevent_free(struct sctp_ulpevent *);
>  int sctp_ulpevent_is_notification(const struct sctp_ulpevent *);
> -void sctp_queue_purge_ulpevents(struct sk_buff_head *list);
> +unsigned int sctp_queue_purge_ulpevents(struct sk_buff_head *list);
>  
>  struct sctp_ulpevent *sctp_ulpevent_make_assoc_change(
>  	const struct sctp_association *asoc,
> diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
> index 6766913..958253a 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/socket.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
> @@ -1384,6 +1384,7 @@ SCTP_STATIC void sctp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
>  	struct sctp_endpoint *ep;
>  	struct sctp_association *asoc;
>  	struct list_head *pos, *temp;
> +	unsigned int data_was_unread;
>  
>  	SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK("sctp_close(sk: 0x%p, timeout:%ld)\n", sk, timeout);
>  
> @@ -1393,6 +1394,10 @@ SCTP_STATIC void sctp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
>  
>  	ep = sctp_sk(sk)->ep;
>  
> +	/* Clean up any skbs sitting on the receive queue.  */
> +	data_was_unread = sctp_queue_purge_ulpevents(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
> +	data_was_unread += sctp_queue_purge_ulpevents(&sctp_sk(sk)->pd_lobby);
> +
>  	/* Walk all associations on an endpoint.  */
>  	list_for_each_safe(pos, temp, &ep->asocs) {
>  		asoc = list_entry(pos, struct sctp_association, asocs);
> @@ -1410,7 +1415,8 @@ SCTP_STATIC void sctp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
>  			}
>  		}
>  
> -		if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_LINGER) && !sk->sk_lingertime) {
> +		if (data_was_unread ||
> +		    (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_LINGER) && !sk->sk_lingertime)) {
>  			struct sctp_chunk *chunk;
>  
>  			chunk = sctp_make_abort_user(asoc, NULL, 0);
> @@ -1420,10 +1426,6 @@ SCTP_STATIC void sctp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
>  			sctp_primitive_SHUTDOWN(asoc, NULL);
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Clean up any skbs sitting on the receive queue.  */
> -	sctp_queue_purge_ulpevents(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
> -	sctp_queue_purge_ulpevents(&sctp_sk(sk)->pd_lobby);
> -
>  	/* On a TCP-style socket, block for at most linger_time if set. */
>  	if (sctp_style(sk, TCP) && timeout)
>  		sctp_wait_for_close(sk, timeout);
> diff --git a/net/sctp/ulpevent.c b/net/sctp/ulpevent.c
> index e70e5fc..aab3184 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/ulpevent.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/ulpevent.c
> @@ -1081,9 +1081,19 @@ void sctp_ulpevent_free(struct sctp_ulpevent *event)
>  }
>  
>  /* Purge the skb lists holding ulpevents. */
> -void sctp_queue_purge_ulpevents(struct sk_buff_head *list)
> +unsigned int sctp_queue_purge_ulpevents(struct sk_buff_head *list)
>  {
>  	struct sk_buff *skb;
> -	while ((skb = skb_dequeue(list)) != NULL)
> +	unsigned int data_unread = 0;
> +
> +	while ((skb = skb_dequeue(list)) != NULL) {
> +		struct sctp_ulpevent *event = sctp_skb2event(skb);
> +
> +		if (!sctp_ulpevent_is_notification(event))
> +			data_unread += skb->len;
> +
>  		sctp_ulpevent_free(sctp_skb2event(skb));
> +	}
> +
> +	return data_unread;
>  }
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-30 14:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-29 13:57 [PATCH] sctp: Enforce maximum retransmissions during shutdown Thomas Graf
2011-06-29 14:20 ` Vladislav Yasevich
2011-06-29 14:36   ` Thomas Graf
2011-06-29 14:58     ` Vladislav Yasevich
2011-06-29 15:48       ` Thomas Graf
2011-06-29 16:14         ` Vladislav Yasevich
2011-06-30  8:49           ` Thomas Graf
2011-06-30 14:08             ` Vladislav Yasevich
2011-06-30 16:17               ` Thomas Graf
2011-07-04 13:50               ` [PATCHv2] sctp: Enforce retransmission limit " Thomas Graf
2011-07-06  7:24                 ` David Miller
2011-07-06 12:15                 ` Neil Horman
2011-07-06 13:16                   ` Thomas Graf
2011-07-06 14:19                     ` Neil Horman
2011-07-06 13:42                 ` Vladislav Yasevich
2011-07-06 14:18                   ` Thomas Graf
2011-07-06 14:31                     ` Vladislav Yasevich
2011-07-06 15:49                       ` Thomas Graf
2011-07-06 16:23                         ` Vladislav Yasevich
2011-07-06 21:58                           ` Thomas Graf
2011-07-07 10:28                           ` [PATCHv3] " Thomas Graf
2011-07-07 13:36                             ` Vladislav Yasevich
2011-07-07 21:09                               ` David Miller
2011-06-30 13:31           ` [PATCH] sctp: ABORT if receive queue is not empty while closing socket Thomas Graf
2011-06-30 14:11             ` Vladislav Yasevich [this message]
2011-06-30 16:19               ` Thomas Graf
2011-06-30 16:27                 ` Vladislav Yasevich
2011-07-08 10:57               ` [PATCHv2] " Thomas Graf
2011-07-08 13:49                 ` Vladislav Yasevich
2011-07-08 14:29                   ` Thomas Graf
2011-07-08 14:37                   ` [PATCHv3] sctp: ABORT if receive, reassmbly, or reodering " Thomas Graf
2011-07-08 16:37                     ` David Miller
2011-07-08 16:43                     ` Vladislav Yasevich
2011-07-08 16:53                       ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E0C83FA.2090909@hp.com \
    --to=vladislav.yasevich@hp$(echo .)com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=sri@us$(echo .)ibm.com \
    --cc=yjwei@cn$(echo .)fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox