Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] per-cgroup tcp buffers control

From: Glauber Costa <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 00:32:54 -0300

On 09/17/2011 03:33 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 09:11:32PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:46:12PM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
>>> +int tcp_init_cgroup_fill(struct proto *prot, struct cgroup *cgrp,
>>> +			 struct cgroup_subsys *ss)
>>> +{
>>> +	prot->enter_memory_pressure	= tcp_enter_memory_pressure;
>>> +	prot->memory_allocated		= memory_allocated_tcp;
>>> +	prot->prot_mem			= tcp_sysctl_mem;
>>> +	prot->sockets_allocated		= sockets_allocated_tcp;
>>> +	prot->memory_pressure		= memory_pressure_tcp;
>>
>> No fancy formatting, please.
>>
>
> What's wrong with having fancy formatting? It's indeed easier to read
> when members are assigned this way. It's always up to maintainer to
> choose what he prefers, but I see nothing wrong in such style (if only it
> doesn't break the style of the whole file).
>
> 	Cyrill

I am in agreement with Cyrill, but I really, really don't care...

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email-masked].  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email-masked]"> [email-masked] </a>