Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] Basic kernel memory functionality for the Memory Controller

From: Glauber Costa <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 17:40:11 -0300

On 09/18/2011 05:39 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 04:11:21PM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> On 09/18/2011 04:05 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:39:12AM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
>>>>> Always zero in root cgroup?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, if we're not accounting, it should be zero. WARN_ON, maybe?
>>>
>>> -ENOSYS?
>>>
>> I'd personally prefer WARN_ON. It is good symmetry from userspace PoV to
>> always be able to get a value out of it. Also, it something goes wrong
>> and it is not zero for some reason, this will help us find it.
>
> What's the point to get non-relevant value?
> What about -ENOSYS + WARN_ON?
>
Well,

what about not even registering kernel memory files for !root cgroup?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email-masked].  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email-masked]"> [email-masked] </a>