Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: fix validation of D-SACK

From: Jan Ceuleers <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 19:29:16 +0200

On 09/19/2011 04:37 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> D-SACK is allowed to reside below snd_una. But the corresponding check
>> in tcp_is_sackblock_valid() is the exact opposite. It looks like a typo.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zheng Yan<[email-masked]>
>> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet<[email-masked]>
> Applied, thanks.

Dave,

Have you also queued it up for stable as per Eric's remark that this was 
introduced in 2.6.24?

Sorry if this is implied in your workflow.

Thanks, Jan