Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/9] foundations of per-cgroup memory pressure controlling.

From: Glauber Costa <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 10:41:02 -0200

On 12/08/2011 11:24 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Mon,  5 Dec 2011 19:34:56 -0200
> Glauber Costa<[email-masked]>  wrote:
>
>> This patch replaces all uses of struct sock fields' memory_pressure,
>> memory_allocated, sockets_allocated, and sysctl_mem to acessor
>> macros. Those macros can either receive a socket argument, or a mem_cgroup
>> argument, depending on the context they live in.
>>
>> Since we're only doing a macro wrapping here, no performance impact at all is
>> expected in the case where we don't have cgroups disabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa<[email-masked]>
>> CC: David S. Miller<[email-masked]>
>> CC: Hiroyouki Kamezawa<[email-masked]>
>> CC: Eric W. Biederman<[email-masked]>
>> CC: Eric Dumazet<[email-masked]>
>
> please get ack from network guys.
> from me.
> Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki<[email-masked]>
>
Ok.

I think that now with all the Reviewed-by:'s I will resend it as a 
Request for Inclusion for Dave (plus fixing the problem you noted in 
patch 1)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email-masked].  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email-masked]"> [email-masked] </a>