Subject: Re: [PATCH] pch_can: fix error passive level test

From: Wolfgang Grandegger <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 10:31:30 +0100

On 12/12/2011 10:17 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 12/12/2011 09:05 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> On 12/12/2011 08:16 AM, Xi Wang wrote:
>>> The test (((errc & PCH_REC) >> 8) > 127) would always be false because
>>> the receive error counter ((errc & PCH_REC) >> 8) is at most 127, where
>>> PCH_REC is defined as 0x7f00.  To test whether the receive error counter
>>> has reached the error passive level, the RP bit (15) should be used.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <[email-masked]>
>>
>> Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <[email-masked]>
> 
> Is this patch a candidate for stable?

You mean for the "net" branch? Yes, I think so.

Wolfgang.