Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] cdc_ether: allow vendor specific data interface if control interface is vendor specific

From: Sergei Shtylyov <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:39:08 +0400

Hello.

On 13-12-2011 8:59, Bjørn Mork wrote:

>> On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 05:33 +0100, Bjorn Mork wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/cdc_ether.c b/drivers/net/usb/cdc_ether.c
>> []
>>> @@ -211,8 +211,12 @@ int usbnet_generic_cdc_bind(struct usbnet *dev, struct usb_interface *intf)
>> []
>>> -				dev_dbg(&intf->dev, "slave class %u\n",
>> []
>>> +				dev_dbg(&intf->dev, "xslave class %u\n",
>>
>> Why change the output from slave to xslave?
>
> That was unintentional.  Sorry.  Don't understand how checkpatch could
> have missed that :-)

    Don't understand what checkpatch.pl would have to do with that. :-)

WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to [email-masked]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html