Subject: Re: [PATCH] bond_alb: do not disable BH under netpoll

From: Maxim Uvarov <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:14:39 -0800

On 03.01.2012 18:49, David Miller wrote:
> From: Maxim Uvarov<[email-masked]>
> Date: Tue,  3 Jan 2012 18:20:18 -0800
>
>> Do not disable BH if interrupts are already disabled
>> (netpoll case).
>> Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov<[email-masked]>
> Barf...
>
> We should never use conditional locking like this.

How about change spin_lock_bh  to spin_lock_irqsave at this place?

Maxim.