From: Li Wei <lw@cn•fujitsu.com>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet•com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question with commit 299b0767(ipv6: Fix IPsec slowpath fragmentation problem)
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:00:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F3B57F4.10106@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120214110414.GA31660@secunet.com>
Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:10:39PM +0800, Li Wei wrote:
>> Hi, Steffen!
>>
>> I found some problem while doing networking tests with IPSec that
>> the first fragment doesn't use the max MTU to fill payload, but with
>> 20 bytes smaller. When I reverted your commit 299b0767(ipv6: Fix
>> IPsec slowpath fragmentation problem), things goes well.
>>
>> Would you so kindly to point me out what the commit did, because I
>> think the original implementation had taken IPSec header and tailer
>> into account.
>>
>
> Without this patch we used always the slow path in ip6_fragment()
> due to a miscalculation of the packet lenght in ip6_append_data().
>
> This patch just makes use of the reduced IPsec mtu, and adapts
> the IPsec header handling to have enought headroom on the skb.
>
>
Hi Steffen,
Thank you for your reply!
I see in your patch that you use the "mtu" of &rt->dst (which taken IPSec
into account) instead of rt->dst.path, but the "exthdrlen" and "dst_exthdrlen"
things process IPSec again. Does some duplication there?
After reverted the patch and put some "printk" things in the slow_path of
ip6_fragment(), setup IPSec transport mode between two hosts, when sending
some echo request which exceeds the MTU, I don't see any "printk" in slow_path
outputed. Could you tell me how to reproduce the slow_path things?
Thanks,
Wei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-15 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-13 8:10 Question with commit 299b0767(ipv6: Fix IPsec slowpath fragmentation problem) Li Wei
2012-02-14 11:04 ` Steffen Klassert
2012-02-15 7:00 ` Li Wei [this message]
2012-02-15 10:40 ` Steffen Klassert
2012-05-14 3:21 ` [PATCH] ipv6: fix incorrect ipsec transport mode fragment Gao feng
2012-05-14 13:05 ` Steffen Klassert
2012-05-14 22:41 ` David Miller
2012-05-17 7:42 ` Gao feng
2012-05-17 8:48 ` David Miller
2012-05-15 3:44 ` Gao feng
2012-05-15 11:48 ` Steffen Klassert
2012-05-16 2:59 ` Gao feng
2012-05-26 9:00 ` Gao feng
2012-05-26 11:29 ` Gao feng
2012-05-26 11:30 ` [PATCH v2] ipv6: fix incorrect ipsec fragment Gao feng
2012-05-27 5:12 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F3B57F4.10106@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=lw@cn$(echo .)fujitsu.com \
--cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox