Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] inet: add second hash table

From: Ben Greear <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 09:27:32 -0700

On 05/30/2012 05:41 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 15:32 +0300, Daniel Baluta wrote:

> UDP case was a bit different, since production machine could really have
> thousand of UDP flows for tunnel terminations.
>
> But for TCP, unless your very specific needs I don't see the real need
> to review 400 lines of patches ?
>
> Nobody but you ever complained of listen() being performance critical
> with 16.000 IP on a machime...

Well, we do similar things and would probably benefit from this change...

If it would help, I'll add these to our kernels and run them through
some of our test cases..but will probably be a week or two at soonest...

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <[email-masked]>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com