Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] inetpeer: add namespace support for inetpeer

From: Gao feng <gaofeng-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public•gmane.org>
To: David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public•gmane.org>
Cc: steffen.klassert-opNxpl+3fjRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public•gmane.org,
	herbert-lOAM2aK0SrRLBo1qDEOMRrpzq4S04n8Q@public•gmane.org,
	eric.dumazet-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public•gmane.org,
	netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public•gmane.org,
	containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public•gmane.org,
	ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public•gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] inetpeer: add namespace support for inetpeer
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 13:27:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD18D36.3090101@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120607.205348.913373847915721607.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>

于 2012年06月08日 11:53, David Miller 写道:
> From: Gao feng <gaofeng@cn•fujitsu.com>
> Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 09:44:04 +0800
> 
>> Sorry for my pool english, I don't understand this.
>> Can you explain it for me?
> 
> Look at the end of the parts of the patch that change
> net/ipv4/inetpeer.c:
> 
> @@ -586,3 +617,3 @@  out:
>  	write_sequnlock_bh(&base->lock);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(inetpeer_invalidate_tree);
> 
> That makes no sense, it's a patch hunk with no "+" or "-"
> lines.

Thanks David,got it.

> 
> Your patch was corrupted by something.
> 
> This is extremely irritating.  I would recommend that you email
> patches to yourself, and try to apply the copies you receive
> in those emails.  Because that's what the people trying to use
> your patch are going to do.
> 

Sorry, I will try it myself next time. ;)
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@lists•linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers