From: Gao feng <gaofeng@cn•fujitsu.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter•org>
Cc: netdev@vger•kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 06/12] netfilter: merge udpv[4,6]_net_init into udp_net_init
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:08:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE0337F.6030000@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120616112259.GG18251@1984>
于 2012年06月16日 19:22, Pablo Neira Ayuso 写道:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 11:41:17AM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
>> merge udpv4_net_init and udpv6_net_init into udp_net_init to
>> reduce the redundancy codes.
>>
>> and use nf_proto_net.users to identify if it's the first time
>> we use the nf_proto_net. when it's the first time,we will
>> initialized it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gao feng <gaofeng@cn•fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c | 56 ++++++++++---------------------
>> 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c
>> index 2b978e6..61bca4f 100644
>> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c
>> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_udp.c
>> @@ -270,52 +270,32 @@ static int udp_kmemdup_compat_sysctl_table(struct nf_proto_net *pn)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static void udp_init_net_data(struct nf_udp_net *un)
>> +static int udp_init_net(struct net *net, u_int16_t proto)
>> {
>> - int i;
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
>> - if (!un->pn.ctl_table) {
>> -#else
>> - if (!un->pn.users++) {
>> -#endif
>> + int ret;
>> + struct nf_udp_net *un = udp_pernet(net);
>> + struct nf_proto_net *pn = &un->pn;
>> +
>> + if (!pn->users) {
>> + int i;
>> for (i = 0; i < UDP_CT_MAX; i++)
>> un->timeouts[i] = udp_timeouts[i];
>> }
>> -}
>> -
>> -static int udpv4_init_net(struct net *net, u_int16_t proto)
>> -{
>> - int ret;
>> - struct nf_udp_net *un = udp_pernet(net);
>> - struct nf_proto_net *pn = (struct nf_proto_net *)un;
>>
>> - udp_init_net_data(un);
>> + if (proto == AF_INET) {
>
> I think we can remove that u_int16_t proto that I proposed to make
> something like:
>
> static int udp_kmemdup_compat_sysctl_table(struct nf_proto_net *pn)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
> #ifdef CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_PROC_COMPAT
> struct nf_udp_net *un = (struct nf_udp_net *)pn;
> +
> + if (pn->ctl_compat_table)
> + return 0;
> +
> pn->ctl_compat_table = kmemdup(udp_compat_sysctl_table,
> sizeof(udp_compat_sysctl_table),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!pn->ctl_compat_table)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> That should be enough to ensure that the compat is registered once. No
> matter if it's done by the IPv4 or IPv6 invocation of udp_init_net.
>
> Thus, it will look consistent with udp_kmemdup_sysctl_table.
yes, but this will be very terrible to unregister compat sysctl
and free compat sysctl table.
thinking about, we may insmod nf_conntrack_ipv6 only, as your idea,
we will allocate compat_sysctl_table.so we have to free it when
rmmod nf_conntrack_ipv6.
in order to implement it, we have to change the logic of
nf_ct_l4proto_unregister_sysctl and nf_ct_unregister_sysctl. because we
only free the sysctl table when we unregister the proto.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-19 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-16 3:41 [PATCH net-next v2 01/12] netfilter: fix problem with proto register Gao feng
2012-06-16 3:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/12] netfilter: add parameter proto for l4proto.init_net Gao feng
2012-06-16 3:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/12] netfilter: add nf_ct_kfree_compat_sysctl_table to make codes clear Gao feng
2012-06-16 11:10 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-06-16 3:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/12] netfilter: regard users as refcount for l4proto's per-net data Gao feng
2012-06-16 10:54 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-06-16 3:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/12] netfilter: merge tcpv[4,6]_net_init into tcp_net_init Gao feng
2012-06-16 10:55 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-06-16 3:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/12] netfilter: merge udpv[4,6]_net_init into udp_net_init Gao feng
2012-06-16 11:22 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-06-19 8:08 ` Gao feng [this message]
2012-06-19 8:12 ` Gao feng
2012-06-19 11:39 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-06-16 3:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/12] netfilter: nf_conntrack_l4proto_udplite[4,6] cleanup Gao feng
2012-06-16 3:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/12] netfilter: merge sctpv[4,6]_net_init into sctp_net_init Gao feng
2012-06-16 3:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 09/12] netfilter: nf_conntrack_l4proto_generic cleanup Gao feng
2012-06-16 11:05 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-06-16 3:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/12] netfilter: nf_conntrack_l4proto_dccp[4,6] cleanup Gao feng
2012-06-16 3:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 11/12] netfilter: nf_conntrack_l4proto_icmp cleanup Gao feng
2012-06-16 11:08 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-06-19 8:14 ` Gao feng
2012-06-16 3:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 12/12] netfilter: nf_conntrack_l4proto_icmpv6 cleanup Gao feng
2012-06-16 10:50 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/12] netfilter: fix problem with proto register Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-06-18 0:59 ` Gao feng
2012-06-18 9:06 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FE0337F.6030000@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=gaofeng@cn$(echo .)fujitsu.com \
--cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox