public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor•com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare•com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix•de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat•com>,
	netdev@vger•kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@solarflare•com,
	x86@kernel•org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86_64, sfc: 128-bit memory-mapped I/O
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 19:31:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5034447C.3020203@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1345601423.2659.100.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com>

On 08/21/2012 07:10 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>
>> Yes, you have to make sure you properly enforce the necessary ordering
>> requirements manually (I think you can do that with sfence).
> 
> We did put an sfence after the writes to each register.  But some
> systems only want to combine writes that cover an entire cache line, and
> the writes covering a 128-bit register get broken back up into multiple
> writes at the PCIe level.  And on some systems these are sent in
> decreasing address order, which breaks the rules for writing to
> TX_DESC_UPD.
> 
> To avoid this we'd have to put an sfence in between the writes to a
> register, leaving us back where we started.
> 

You realize the same applies to 128-bit writes, right?  Some cores
and/or systems will break them up.

	-hpa

      reply	other threads:[~2012-08-22  2:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-22  1:17 [PATCH 0/3] x86_64, sfc: 128-bit memory-mapped I/O Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22  1:20 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86_64: Define 128-bit types for kernel code only Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22  1:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86_64: Define 128-bit memory-mapped I/O operations Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22  1:37   ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22  2:04     ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22  2:34       ` David Miller
2012-08-22  3:24         ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22  3:29           ` David Miller
2012-08-22  3:49             ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22  3:52           ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22  3:59             ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22  4:14               ` David Miller
2012-08-22 21:14                 ` David Miller
2012-08-22 21:28                   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 21:38                     ` David Miller
2012-08-22  4:35               ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22  5:00                 ` David Miller
2012-08-22 14:06                   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22  4:42             ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 13:26             ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 14:20               ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 14:24                 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 14:30                   ` Benjamin LaHaise
2012-08-22 14:58                     ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 15:13                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22 15:27                         ` David Laight
2012-08-22 15:49                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22 15:51                           ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 15:54                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22 16:44                               ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 16:49                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22 16:55                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 17:09                                   ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 17:12                                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22 17:27                                       ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 17:54                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 18:11                                           ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 18:18                                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22 18:28                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 19:01                                               ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 17:26                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 16:51                               ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 16:59                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22 15:51                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22 14:50                   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 14:56                     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 15:05                       ` David Laight
2012-08-22 15:16                         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 15:41                     ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 14:42                 ` David Laight
2012-08-22  1:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] sfc: Use __raw_writeo() to perform TX descriptor push where possible Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22  1:38 ` [PATCH 0/3] x86_64, sfc: 128-bit memory-mapped I/O H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22  1:43   ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22  1:59     ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22  2:10       ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22  2:31         ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5034447C.3020203@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor$(echo .)com \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-net-drivers@solarflare$(echo .)com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix$(echo .)de \
    --cc=x86@kernel$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox