Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries

From: Vlad Yasevich <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:59:22 -0400

On 09/10/2012 01:18 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Vlad Yasevich <[email-masked]>
> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:35:03 -0400
>
>> I am not sure this is right...  This has a side-effect that when an
>> rt_cache_flush() is called, it invalidates IPv6 routes a well....
>>
>> Its all fine and good do this when a new policy is added, but not when
>> IPv4 routing table changes.
>
> I disagree.
>

So you are perfectly ok with invalidating IPv6 cache when IPv4 table 
changes, but not invalidating IPv4 cache if IPv6 table changes?

-vlad