Subject: Re: Possible networking regression in 3.6.0

From: Chris Clayton <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 20:55:08 +0100

On 10/01/12 20:21, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 20:34 +0200, Captain Obvious wrote:
>> Eric Dumazet <[email-masked]> :
>> [...]
>>>>> Could you send
>>>>>
>>>>> iptables -t -nat -nvL
>>>>
>>>> $ iptables -t -nat -nvL
>>                    ^ typo
>>
>> Please try "iptables -t nat -nvL" as was also suggested.
>>
>
> Oh well, good catch ;)
>
> And for conntrack -L, please Chris add CONFIG_NF_CT_NETLINK=m to your
> kernel .config
>

$ conntrack -L
unknown  2 566 src=192.168.0.1 dst=224.0.0.1 [UNREPLIED] src=224.0.0.1 
dst=192.168.0.1 use=1
icmp     1 25 src=192.168.200.1 dst=192.168.0.1 type=8 code=0 id=512 
src=192.168.0.1 dst=192.168.0.40 type=0 code=0 id=512 use=1
conntrack v1.2.2 (conntrack-tools): 2 flow entries have been shown.