public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt•org>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger•com>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix•de>,
	netdev@vger•kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org,
	shawn.guo@linaro•org, davem@davemloft•net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: fec: Add support for multiple phys on mdiobus
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:19:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50FEAE12.7090307@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50FEAA28.1070003@grandegger.com>

On 01/22/2013 04:03 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> On 01/22/2013 03:47 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 01/22/2013 08:22 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>>> Well this could be done when the fixed phy driver could be registered
>>>> with the devicetree, maybe like this:
>>>>
>>>>      fixed-phy: mdiophy {
>>>>          compatible = "mdio-fixed-phy";
>>>>          link = "100FD";
>>>>      };
>>> I find that confusing. There is *no* phy but just a fixed link to the
>>> switch...
>>>
>>>> The good thing about this would be that every ethernet driver could just
>>>> use such a fixed phy, any external mdio phy (like on Marvell Armada) or
>>>> just a phy connected to the internal mdio interface provided by the
>>>> ethernet
>>>> core.
>>> What is wrong with the existing "fixed-link" property of the *ethernet*
>>> node. The fixed-link handling should/could be done in the phy layer, and
>>> not in the driver as it currently is implemented. Maybe that's the
>>> reason why the current code is regarded as hack!
>> As far as I have used it with the CPMAC driver, the fixed PHY is a
>> specific PHY device and there is no specific handling to be done by the
>> Ethernet MAC driver but eventually changing its MII bus id so that it is
>> named "fixed-0" to allow the fixed PHY driver to bind. Put differently,
> There is special handling for the fixed link, e.g. here:
>
> http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.7.4/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar.c#L1462
>
> This could be hidden in the PHY layer allowing all ethernet drivers
> using the "fixed-link" property.

Ok, so in the end you could have potentially an ethernet PHY node 
containing the following properties:
- fixed-link
- fixed-speed
- fixed-duplex

and treat it as a fixed-phy. If so, this would be pretty handy.

>
>> using the fixed PHY driver is a kind of "last" resort thing to cope with
>> situations like:
>>
>> - switch not providing a consistent PHY-like interface on the MDC/MDIO bus
>> - switches not connected to the MDC/MDIO bus of the Ethernet MAC they
>> forward to
>>
>> What exactly do you mean by "as it currently is implemented"? that you
>> do not like?
> As Sascha pointed out, the implementation is labeled as "hack", which
> should be fixed sooner than later. It's just not clear why ;).
>
> Wolfgang.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger•kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-22 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-21  8:37 [PATCH] net: fec: Add support for multiple phys on mdiobus Sascha Hauer
2013-01-21  8:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] net: fec: refactor dt probing Sascha Hauer
2013-01-21 17:48   ` Baruch Siach
2013-01-21 18:27     ` Sascha Hauer
2013-01-21  8:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] net: fec: Add support for phys from devicetree Sascha Hauer
2013-01-21  8:56 ` [PATCH] net: fec: Add support for multiple phys on mdiobus Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-01-21 10:07   ` Sascha Hauer
2013-01-21 11:07     ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-01-21 11:12       ` Florian Fainelli
2013-01-21 11:33         ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-01-21 11:56         ` Sascha Hauer
2013-01-21 12:06       ` Sascha Hauer
2013-01-22  7:22         ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-01-22 14:47           ` Florian Fainelli
2013-01-22 15:03             ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-01-22 15:19               ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2013-01-22 15:26                 ` Wolfgang Grandegger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50FEAE12.7090307@openwrt.org \
    --to=florian@openwrt$(echo .)org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix$(echo .)de \
    --cc=shawn.guo@linaro$(echo .)org \
    --cc=wg@grandegger$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox