Subject: Re: v3 for tcp friends?

From: Li Yu <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 17:52:18 +0800

于 2013年01月23日 17:39, Li Yu 写道:
> 于 2013年01月23日 15:58, Li Yu 写道:
>> 于 2013年01月23日 15:21, Li Yu 写道:
>>> 于 2013年01月23日 14:46, Eric Dumazet 写道:
>>>> On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 14:12 +0800, Li Yu wrote:
>>>>> Oops, this hang is not since TCP friends patch!
>>>>>
>>>>> sk_sndbuf_get() is broken by 32 bits integer overflow
>>>>> because of so large value in net.ipv4.tcp_{rmem,wmem}.
>>>>>
>>>>> but this hang also can be found in net-next.git
>>>>> (3.8.0-rc3+), if we run below commands, then all new
>>>>> TCP connections stop working!
>>>>>
>>>>> # when TCP friends is disabled
>>>>> sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_rmem="4096 4294967296 4294967296" # 4GB
>>>>> sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_wmem="4096 4294967296 4294967296"
>>>>
>>>> Right we need to make sure we dont overflow.
>>>>
>>>> Try the following fix :
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c
>>>> index a25e1d2..1459145 100644
>>>> --- a/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c
>>>> +++ b/net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c
>>>> @@ -549,14 +549,16 @@ static struct ctl_table ipv4_table[] = {
>>>>           .data        = &sysctl_tcp_wmem,
>>>>           .maxlen        = sizeof(sysctl_tcp_wmem),
>>>>           .mode        = 0644,
>>>> -        .proc_handler    = proc_dointvec
>>>> +        .extra1        = &zero,
>
> If we added below:
>
> +static int one = 1;
> +static int int_max = INT_MAX;
> ....
> +               .extra1     = &one,
> +        .extra2        = &int_max,
>

The "int_max" may be unnecessary here :)

> The bug is fixed without TCP friends.
>
> Maybe, TCP friends need to use long integer to record result
> of "sk->sk_sndbuf + sk->sk_friend->sk_rcvbuf" ?
>
> BTW: This overflow problem also breaks UDP sockets.

Unix domain sockets is broken too, and any other ?

thanks

Yu

>
> Thanks
>
> Yu
>
>>>> +        .proc_handler    = proc_dointvec_minmax
>>>>       },
>>>>       {
>>>>           .procname    = "tcp_rmem",
>>>>           .data        = &sysctl_tcp_rmem,
>>>>           .maxlen        = sizeof(sysctl_tcp_rmem),
>>>>           .mode        = 0644,
>>>> -        .proc_handler    = proc_dointvec
>>>> +        .extra1        = &zero,
>>>> +        .proc_handler    = proc_dointvec_minmax
>>>>       },
>>>>       {
>>>>           .procname    = "tcp_app_win",
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Thanks for so quick reply, I will test it soon.
>>>
>>> however I suspect whether this patch could fix overflow if we merged TCP
>>> friends patch in future.
>>>
>>
>> Tested on 3.7.0-rc1+, but bug is still alive
>> with disabled TCP friends ...
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Yu
>>
>>> With TCP friends, we have source like below, or TCP friends should care
>>> this ?
>>>
>>> static inline int sk_sndbuf_get(const struct sock *sk)
>>> {
>>>          if (sk->sk_friend)
>>>                  return sk->sk_sndbuf + sk->sk_friend->sk_rcvbuf;
>>>          else
>>>                  return sk->sk_sndbuf;
>>> }
>>>
>>> static inline bool sk_stream_memory_free(const struct sock *sk)
>>> {
>>>          return sk_wmem_queued_get(sk) < sk_sndbuf_get(sk);
>>> }
>>>
>>> So sk_sndbuf_get() still may be overflow when we have right value in
>>> net.ipv4.tcp_{rmem,wmem}.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>
>