Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] VSOCK: Introduce VM Sockets

From: Gerd Hoffmann <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 12:05:53 +0100

On 02/07/13 01:23, Andy King wrote:
> +		written = transport->stream_enqueue(
> +				vsk, msg->msg_iov,
> +				len - total_written);

Hmm, shouldn't we pass total_written to stream_enqueue here?

In case a blocking send(big-buffer) call gets splitted into multiple
stream_enqueue calls the second (and further) stream_enqueue calls need
to know at which msg offset they should continue sending the data, no?

cheers,
  Gerd