public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Chavent <Paul.Chavent@onera•fr>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail•com>
Cc: davem@davemloft•net, edumazet@google•com,
	daniel.borkmann@tik•ee.ethz.ch, xemul@parallels•com,
	ebiederm@xmission•com, netdev@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] net : add tx timestamp to packet mmap.
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 12:42:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5163F0B1.7090309@onera.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121213181733.GA2312@netboy.at.omicron.at>



On 12/13/2012 07:17 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 05:13:56PM +0100, Paul Chavent wrote:
>>>
>>> In order for time stamps to appear, somebody has to call
>>> skb_tx_timestamp() ...
>> Yes. "Somebody" means "the hardware driver" after completing xmit.
>> That's true ?
>
> Yes, the MAC driver must call this helper function, but not many
> drivers do this yet. You didn't say which MAC driver you are using and
> whether it supports Tx SO_TIMESTAMPING or not.
>
>> Yes, it only sets some flags. I thought that those flags was
>> required by the skb_tx_timestamp() in order to make the appropriate
>> timestamping (hardware, software, etc).
>>
>> So in order to have tx timestamp that work, both calls are needed ?
>
> Yes.
>
>> Why sock_tx_timestamp is called in packet_fill_skb and
>> packet_sendmsg_spkt and not in tpacket_fill_skb ?
>> Why i can retrieve timestamps when i add this call ?
>
> Sorry, I don't know much about packet mmap. Last time I tried it, some
> years ago, it wasn't really working.
>
> Richard
>
Hi.

Would it be possible that the packet mmap maintainers give their opinion 
on this thread please ?

Regards.

Paul.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-04-09 10:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-12 15:29 [RFC] net : add tx timestamp to packet mmap Paul Chavent
2012-12-12 19:23 ` David Miller
2012-12-13  7:13   ` Paul Chavent
2012-12-13 13:29 ` Richard Cochran
2012-12-13 16:13   ` Paul Chavent
2012-12-13 18:17     ` Richard Cochran
2012-12-14  7:57       ` Paul Chavent
2013-04-09 10:42       ` Paul Chavent [this message]
2013-04-09 13:15         ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-13 18:33     ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-13 18:56       ` [PATCH] net-packet: tx timestamping on tpacket ring Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-13 22:18         ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-13 22:47           ` David Miller
2013-04-14  0:04             ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-14  0:16               ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-14  0:49                 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-14  5:16                   ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-14  0:00           ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-14 10:52             ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-14 13:07               ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-15  7:37                 ` Paul Chavent
2013-04-15 16:56                   ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-15 16:59                   ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-17 10:22                     ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-19 21:51                     ` [PATCH net-next v2] packet: " Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-20 12:33                       ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-21  2:30                         ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-21 10:10                           ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-21 16:42                             ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-21 18:14                               ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-22  8:19                               ` Paul Chavent
2013-04-22 10:25                                 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-22 14:23                                 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-20 16:43                       ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-21  2:34                         ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-15 15:41               ` [PATCH] net-packet: " Paul Chavent
2013-04-15  9:45           ` David Laight
2013-04-15 17:08             ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-15 17:31             ` David Miller
2013-04-15  7:31         ` Paul Chavent
2013-04-15 16:37           ` Willem de Bruijn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5163F0B1.7090309@onera.fr \
    --to=paul.chavent@onera$(echo .)fr \
    --cc=daniel.borkmann@tik$(echo .)ee.ethz.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission$(echo .)com \
    --cc=edumazet@google$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=xemul@parallels$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox